Gevorg Mirzayan
The fact that there is a chance of talks being held at all can be considered a major success. Poroshenko previously refused to send delegates to Minsk to talk to the representatives of the unrecognized Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics (DPR and LPR) in eastern Ukraine, with Russia and the OSCE acting as mediators. He preferred to hold negotiations in Geneva with Russia, using the United States and the European Union as mediators.
ПРЕМИУМ
23 december 2014 | 23:00

New Minsk negotiations to focus on ceasefire, not peace

The text was originally published in Russia Beyond the Headlines

Leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France agree dates for Minsk talks. The next meetings of the trilateral Contact Group negotiating measures to settle the conflict in eastern Ukraine are expected to be held in Minsk on Wednesday, December 24, and Friday, December 26.

The fact that there is a chance of talks being held at all can be considered a major success.

Poroshenko previously refused to send delegates to Minsk to talk to the representatives of the unrecognized Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics (DPR and LPR) in eastern Ukraine, with Russia and the OSCE acting as mediators. He preferred to hold negotiations in Geneva with Russia, using the United States and the European Union as mediators.

Moscow, however, refused to sit down at the negotiating table that way, claiming that Russia is not a party to the conflict. Only a discussion with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden convinced Poroshenko to change his mind and agree to the Minsk format. However, the Ukrainian authorities refuse to view the representatives of the DPR and LPR as a party to the conflict and a negotiating partner.

“Three parties – Russia, Ukraine, and the OSCE – are preparing to hold negotiations, while Belarus is willing to ensure all the conditions necessary for talks within the trilateral contact group,” Speaker of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Andriy Lysenko said.

Deteriorating situation poses challenges

Despite the talks, it is still too early to assume the conflict will be settled. The situation has deteriorated so dramatically in the last few months that the parties will find it difficult to go back to fulfilling the Minsk agreements signed on Sept. 5.

“Since then, the parties have done much to violate those agreements,” said Sergei Markedonov, an associate professor at the Russian State University for the Humanities and a top specialist on the post-Soviet space. “Kiev pulled state-run companies and structures from the Donbass, pensions are no longer being paid to local retirees, and the law on special status was rejected even in its abbreviated form.”

“It is unclear how to go back to the signed agreements after those actions. So the parties might simply try to adopt measures to prevent the conflict from getting worse in the run-up to winter,” said Markedonov.

At first glance, the situation on the front (the transition from offensive operations to trench warfare) should facilitate a start to the negotiating process.

“However, there is still no comprehensive understanding or a roadmap on how to get out of the situation. So I don’t expect any breakthroughs in Minsk because the parties have not changed their positions,” Markedonov said.

Uncompromising positions

Poroshenko is setting forth very tough conditions.

“The pseudo elections that occurred on the territories controlled by the terrorists on Nov. 2 must be canceled, and preparations must be initiated to organize local elections in line with Ukrainian law,” the president said.

As a precondition, the leadership of the DPR and the LPR is being asked to relinquish claims to sovereignty.

In parallel, the West is demanding that Russia put pressure on the breakaway republics to accept the conditions. The Kremlin refuses.

“What benefit would Moscow get from that pressure?” Markedonov asked. “It should exercise pressure in its own interests, not for the purpose of concessions and subsequent loss. The maximum they can count on is Russia putting pressure [on the ‘republics’] in order to reduce the intensity of the conflict and force the separatists to initiate the negotiating process,” the associate professor said.

However, even moderate pressure by Moscow would upset the leadership of the breakaway republics, which is counting on the continued support of Russia.

Moscow might be able to better convince the so-called ‘republics’ to make concessions if Kiev were willing to take Russia’s opinion into consideration.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that the Kremlin views the Donbass as part of a unified Ukraine, albeit a federal Ukraine which guarantees regions the right to their own economic, social, and cultural policies. However, Poroshenko, whom Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov calls Russia’s “main partner in Kiev,” refuses to move forward with decentralizing the country.

“Right now he isn’t the sole leader in the country, like Putin, Lukashenko, Nazarbayev, or Heydar Aliyev, who led the negotiations on [the disputed Armenian and Azerbaijani territory of] Karabakh and signed the agreement on May 12, 1994. Ukraine has at least one other center of power led by Yatsenyuk, and at most a whole scattering of smaller mini-centers. And they are all much more radical. The president is being forced to reckon with them,” Markedonov said.

READ MORE ON THE TOPIC «Politics»

12 may 2015 | 10:26

The UN 70th anniversary: crucial issues and value for Russia

70 years ago, on April 25, 1945, 50 nations opened the San-Francisco Conference that eventually resulted in the establishment of the UN. The Organization became the keystone of the international security system, while its basic principles, such as supremacy of international law, sovereign equality of states and joint approach to the settlement of international problems, remain the unchanged benchmarks of Russian foreign policy throughout decades. 

30 june 2014 | 23:00

Moscow stands for status quo in Ukraine

The beginning of Ukranian peace talks is an important step for all sides. Kremlin's stand should also be taken into account given how strongly Russia and Ukraine are connected.

 
21 may 2018 | 18:45

Problems and prospects for forming the Russian lobby in the USA

The US media are creating an impression that no other country is more influential than Russia. The union of Russian hackers and trolls has become a real nightmare for America and has led to deep paranoia. However, Russia’s influence in the United States is a myth, and a Russian lobby does not exist. This is borne out at least by the spasmodic attempts of Russian businesspeople to knock on doors in Washington because of the threat of falling under US sanctions.

9 october 2014 | 23:00

Looking behind the Russia-Iran relationship

Russian-Iranian relations have a much longer history and in many ways a more nuanced agenda. But if one would coin a concise definition for their current dealings, it could easily be "compelled adversaries, pragmatic pals."

What′s your opinion on this?

Dossier
10 september 2015 | 21:00
16 january 2015 | 22:00
22 december 2014 | 23:00
18 december 2014 | 21:00
1 september 2014 | 23:00
4 march 2014 | 23:00
25 february 2014 | 23:00
2 december 2013 | 23:00
Next page Previous page
 
Get access to our free content
Do not show again