Gevorg Mirzayan
As a result of the chill in relations between Moscow and Washington over Russia’s involvement in the Ukrainian crisis, Russia has already left the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, and the future of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces and START treaties hangs in doubt. How serious a threat do these developments represent to global nuclear security and what further steps are the two sides likely to take?  
7 may 2015 | 21:00

New Cold War conditions imperil global nuclear security

The text was originally published at RBTH

The crisis in Russian-American relations engendered by the conflict in Ukraine is threatening world nuclear stability, with Russia's exit from the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) a direct consequence of the confrontation over events in Ukraine. Moreover, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) is also now in question, as well as future cooperation in the nuclear field.

Misunderstanding and mistrust are growing between Russia and the U.S., which have already put the issue of future nuclear disarmament in question.

"The Russian government, aware of the extremely unpleasant external situation, does not think it is possible to further reduce the amount of nuclear weapons," says Pyotr Topychkanov, coordinator of the Problems of Non-Proliferation Program at the Moscow Carnegie Center.

Moreover, Moscow will most likely continue developing its nuclear potential. The Russian Ministry of Defense announced that the latest tests of the Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile were successful and that it is ready to include the missile in its arsenal. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin calls the new rocket "the missile defense killer."

Russian-American cooperation in non-proliferation of nuclear weapons has also become difficult.

"Russia is still against the appearance of new nuclear countries," continues Topychkanov. "But it is not hurrying to support American initiatives in the field of proliferation, preferring international efforts under the aegis of the UN."

Tension is growing

According to the Kommersant newspaper, more than 40 percent of the participants in the International Conference on Nuclear Non-Proliferation, which took place at the end of March at the Carnegie Foundation, recognized that in the next two years either Russia or the U.S. will abandon key agreements in the field of armament control: the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) or the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).

In the opinion of Sergei Rogov, director of the Institute of U.S. and Canada Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, current relations between Russia and the U.S. have been aggravated to the limit and therefore it can be said that a new Cold War has begun.

"The armament control regime is being threatened. The INF and the START agreements are being threatened,” Rogov told the Rossiya Segodnya news agency at a press conference, warning that the INF could become obsolete by the end of 2015. “The entire regime that was developed during the Cold War is falling apart,” said Rogov. “If competition without regulation begins, we will return to the times of the Cuban crisis, to the verge of a war."

Pyotr Topychkanov is more optimistic, however:

"General Purpose Forces are already being increased. But this will not necessarily push Russia out of the INF Treaty. There are other ways of reacting to this, first of all in the field of General Purpose Forces.”

Approaches need to be reviewed

Andrei Sushentsov, Managing Partner at the Vneshnyaya Politika Analytical Agency, said that there are several scenarios to the development of Russian-American relations, the worst of which would be the continuation of the policy of isolating Russia and the tightening of sanctions. However, Sushentsov believes that Moscow and Washington would like to avoid such a course of events. This can be deduced by Barack Obama's refusal so far to supply Ukraine with lethal weapons.

A more moderate scenario says that relations between Washington and Moscow will develop in accordance with American-Chinese relations.

"In its national security strategy the U.S. indicates that one of its main aims is not to misevaluate China's behavior," says Sushentsov.

Sushentsov believes that the current crisis was made possible by the fact that in the last 20 years the United States has not been very circumspect in its evaluation of Russia.

"The Americans think that Russia is in decline and has no alternative but to assume a minor role in the Euro-Atlantic community under the conditions dictated by NATO. When the U.S. realizes that this is not true, it will open a new phase in Russian-American relations."


6 february 2014 | 23:00

Sochi: Myths and reality

The U.S. State Department has advised travelers of a heightened terrorism threat, and warned tourists against stating their nationality in public or wearing any clothes that might indicate that they are American. There is, however, evidence that the threat is being overstated. 

2 april 2015 | 14:00

Allies on alert: NATO’s reaction to the threat of a Russian ‘hybrid war’

The key question for Russia is whether the Operation Atlantic Resolve will become the start of permanent stationing of American and NATO forces in the countries of former Warsaw Pact and the post-Soviet space. Moscow insists that its security needs be taken into account, whereas the American leadership believes that the motives of Russia stem from “misinterpretations and outdated thinking”.     

21 august 2014 | 23:00

Humanitarian convoy is now a vital piece in the political game

Negotiations on the fate of the Russian humanitarian convoy of nearly 300 trucks, which has already been on the Russo-Ukrainian border for nearly a week, are drawing to a close. The sides have agreed on all issues related to customs clearances, and observers have not found any weaponry at all in the trucks.

3 september 2014 | 23:00

Tough NATO response over Ukraine may lead to greater divisions with Russia

Although Russian political scientists do not believe the plans pose a serious threat, they are not ruling out a disproportionate reaction by the Kremlin, citing suspicion dictated by historical experience as a key factor.

What′s your opinion on this?

10 september 2015 | 21:00
16 january 2015 | 22:00
22 december 2014 | 23:00
18 december 2014 | 21:00
1 september 2014 | 23:00
4 march 2014 | 23:00
25 february 2014 | 23:00
2 december 2013 | 23:00
19 september 2016 | 10:30
7 april 2016 | 20:00
10 april 2015 | 21:00
10 april 2015 | 21:00
23 march 2015 | 21:00
18 december 2014 | 21:00
10 november 2014 | 23:00
9 december 2013 | 23:00
Next page Previous page
Get access to our free content
Do not show again